Hide filters
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
3420(f)(2)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 65-4.5(d)(1)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
17(3)(a)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 6-2.3(f)(11)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 65-4.5(d)(3)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 60-2.4(b)(2)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
17(1)(a)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
5106(b)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 65-4.5(d)(1)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 60-2.4(b)(1)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 65-4.5(d)(4)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 60-2.4(b)(3)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
17(2)(a)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 60-2.3(c)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 65-4.5(d)(2)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
11, 60-2.4(b)(1)
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2023-F1
Type:
Formal
Section:
17
Subject Title:
Members of Department of Financial Services Arbitrator Screening Committees are eligible for section 17 coverage
Abstract:
Members of the No-Fault Arbitrator Screening Committee and the Supplementary Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Arbitrator Screening Committee are persons holding a position “by appointment” and are in “the service of the state” and thus are “employees” for purposes of section 17 and are eligible for defense and indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law § 17.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
9-112(3)
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
9-112(4)
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
3-312(5)
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
6-122
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
9-112(3)
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
3-301(4)
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
9-112(6)
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.
Opinion #:
2021-2
Type:
Informal
Section:
3-312(5)
Subject Title:
Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices;Counting a ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices
Abstract:
A ballot that contains two votes for the same person for incompatible offices, one printed and one written in, should be counted as a blank vote for both of those offices.